This specification defines a standard for establishing and verifying associations between blockchain accounts. This allows addresses to publicly declare, prove and revoke a relationship with other addresses by sharing a standardized payload. For onchain applications, this payload may be signed by both parties for third-party authentication. This enables use cases like sub-account identity inheritance, authorization delegation, and reputation collation.
A key motivation is the simplification of multi-address resolution, which is essential for managing complex digital identities across multiple platforms and accounts. This simplification aims to streamline the process of locating and verifying individuals or entities by efficiently handling multiple addresses linked by Associations. By providing a standard mechanism for signaling an association between two accounts, this standard unlocks the capability to link the activities or details of these accounts.
The inclusion of arbitrary data into the specified payload ensures flexibility for various use cases such as delegation, hierarchical relationships, and authentication. By maintaining a flexible architecture that accepts an interface identifier paired with arbitrary data bytes, accounts that associate can do so with application-specific context.
The system outlined in this document describes a way for two accounts to be linked by a specified data struct which describes the relationship between them. It offers the mechanism by which these parties can sign over the contents to prove validity. It focuses on the structure and process for generating, validating and revoking such records while maintaining an implementation agnostic approach.
The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “NOT RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 and RFC 8174.
Each Association between two accounts denotes the participating addresses as initiator and approver. These accounts can be on disparate chains with different architectures made possible by a combination of ERC-7930 Interoperable Addresses and an enumeration of signature key types. To accommodate non-EVM account types, addresses are recorded in the association as raw bytes.
The specification outlines a nested structure for recording Associations:
The following is a Solidity implementation of an AssociatedAccountRecord which contains the shared payload describing the association.
Where the AssociatedAccountRecord contains:
initiator is the binary representation of an ERC-7930 address for the initiating account.approver is the binary representation of an ERC-7930 address for the approving account.validAt is the timestamp from which the association is valid.validUntil is the timestamp at which the association expires (optional).interfaceId is the 4-byte interface or method selector for the data field (optional).data is the arbitrary context data payload (optional).When AssociatedAccountRecords will be consumed in a trustless context, integrators SHOULD require that both parties sign over the EIP-712 hash of the AssociatedAccountRecord (see Support for EIP-712 below). The resulting signatures MUST be included in a SignedAssociationRecord.
Where the SignedAssociationRecord contains:
revokedAt is the timestamp when the association was revoked, which is 0 unless the association has been revoked by either party.initiatorSignature is the signature bytes generated by the initiator by signing the EIP-712 compliant hash of the AssociatedAccountRecord.initiatorKeyType is the key type designator for the initiator's signature (see Key Types below).approverSignature is the signature bytes generated by the approver by signing the EIP-712 compliant hash of the AssociatedAccountRecord.approverKeyType is the key type designator for the approver's signature (see Key Types below).record is the AssociatedAccountRecord that was signed by both parties.To accommodate known curves and signing protocols while providing future extensibility, this specification relies on the enumeration of cryptographic curves and signing protocols. Each signature MUST be paired with a valid "Key ID" designator.
The Key IDs SHALL be identified as a 2-byte integer according to the following extensible table. We accommodate two types of keys:
To distinguish these key types, the most significant bit in the 2-byte identifier SHALL be used as a bit flag. As such, key type protocols are constructed by bitwise OR:
0x8000 | PROTOCOL_ID.
The resulting table enumerates the known keys and distinguishes between the two types:
| Key ID | Type | Curve/Standard |
|---|---|---|
| 0x0000 | Delegated | Delegated auth |
| 0x0001 | K1 | secp256k1 |
| 0x0002 | R1 | secp256r1 |
| 0x0003 | BLS | BLS12-381 |
| 0x0004 | EdDSA | Ed25519 |
| 0x8001 | WebAuthn | WebAuthn/Passkey |
| 0x8002 | ERC-1271 | Contract validation |
| 0x8003 | ERC-6492 | Predeploy contract validation |
In some contexts it might be ergonomic to delegate authorization to another account, access control mechanism, or external protocol. Implementers leveraging the Delegated key type MUST also publish how consumers can parse the application-specific delegation schema.
All signatures contained in this specification MUST comply with EIP-712 wherein the signature preimage can be generated from:
Where DOMAIN_SEPARATOR is defined according to EIP-712. The DOMAIN_SEPARATOR for this ERC SHALL be defined as:
If desired, a SignedAssociationRecord MAY be stored onchain in a context-specific storage contract.
An onchain storage contract SHALL comply with the following steps:
AssociationCreated event:where:
hash is the indexed hash for the SignedAssociationRecord, equivalent to the EIP-712 hash of the underlying AAR.initiator is the keccak256 hash of the ERC-7930 address of the account that initiated the association.approver is the keccak256 hash of the ERC-7930 address of the account that accepted and completed the association.sar is the completed SignedAssociationRecord.If a SignedAssociationRecord is stored onchain, it MUST also be revokable onchain (see Revocation section below).
In some contexts, it might be desirable for Signed Association Records to be stored in an offchain store. While the implementation will differ from application-to-application, the following considerations SHOULD be taken into account:
Clients or contracts determining whether a SignedAssociationRecord is valid at the time of consumption MUST check all of the following validation steps:
validAt timestamp.validUntil timestamp is nonzero, the current timestamp MUST be less than the validUntil timestamp.revokedAt timestamp is nonzero, the current timestamp MUST be less than the revokedAt timestamp.initiatorSignature field is populated, the signature MUST be valid for the EIP-712 preimage of the underlying AssociatedAccountRecord using an appropriate initiatorKeyType validation mechanism.approverSignature field is populated, the signature MUST be valid for the EIP-712 preimage of the underlying AssociatedAccountRecord using an appropriate approverKeyType validation mechanism.Onchain validation is possible as long as there are sufficient validation mechanisms for the various key types used by the two accounts. In the case that validation occurs onchain, implementations MUST replace "current timestamp" with block.timestamp.
Onchain Association stores MUST implement a revocation method. This method MUST allow either party of an Association to revoke a valid, active association by submitting a revocation request.
In such contexts, storage contracts MUST update the revokedAt field of the SAR to block.timestamp OR the account-specified revocation timestamp, whichever is greater. Then the implementation contract MUST emit the following event upon accepting a valid revocation request:
where:
hash is the indexed unique identifier for the association, equivalent to the EIP-712 hash of the underlying AAR.revokedBy is the indexed keccak256 hash of the ERC-7930 address of the revoking account.revokedAt is the timestamp at which the association is revoked.Offchain stores MUST allow either account to revoke a stored association and MUST update the revokedAt timestamp accordingly.
If a previously revoked association is revoked again with an earlier timestamp, the earlier timestamp MUST take precedence.
The separation of AssociatedAccountRecord and SignedAssociationRecord into distinct structures serves a critical functional purpose. The inner AssociatedAccountRecord contains the immutable association payload that both parties must agree upon. This record can be shared, reviewed, and prepared while signatures are collected asynchronously from each party. The outer SignedAssociationRecord wrapper accumulates these signatures and metadata without modifying the underlying record.
Currently, no standardized mechanism exists for establishing verifiable associations between blockchain accounts. Existing approaches are either application-specific or rely on proprietary schemas that limit interoperability. This specification addresses that gap by providing a common format that can be adopted across applications, enabling portability and composability of identity relationships.
Today's blockchain ecosystem enforces a rigid one-to-one relationship between onchain identities and addresses, limiting users to a single address per identity. This specification breaks that constraint by enabling users to maintain a unified identity across multiple addresses. Users benefit from maintaining separate accounts for different contexts or applications while preserving the ability to verifiably link them to a primary identity when desired. This standard provides the mechanism for establishing these connections, enabling app-scoped sub accounts that can be provably associated with a root identity without sacrificing the flexibility and security benefits of address separation.
Different association types have varying requirements for accessibility, cost, and decentralization. High-value associations requiring maximum trust minimization may warrant onchain storage despite higher costs, while frequent or ephemeral associations may be better suited for offchain stores. By remaining agnostic to storage location and requiring only that validation rules be consistently applied, this specification allows implementers to choose the appropriate tradeoffs for their use case without fragmenting the standard itself.
For onchain applications, the validation mechanisms for some key types might be gas-cost prohibitive or entirely unavailable. It is the responsibility of the integrator to ensure that unsupported key types are appropriately handled given these constraints.
Offchain stores expose a trust vector to consumers. Integrators and consumers MUST take into account this centralization vector and expose the risk to users or offer mechanisms for minimizing the trust assumptions (i.e. storing some state onchain).
Associations SHOULD have a canonical storage location given an application. However, in the event that the same Association data is stored both on and offchain, precedence SHOULD be given to the onchain data.
Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.