EIP-7495: SSZ StableContainer

Abstract

---

This EIP introduces two new Simple Serialize (SSZ) types to enable forward-compatible containers.

A StableContainer[N] extends an SSZ Container with stable merkleization and forward-compatible serialization even when individual fields are deprecated or new fields are introduced in the future.

Furthermore, Profile[B] is introduced to support specialized sub-types of StableContainer[N] while retaining the merkleization of the base type. This is useful, e.g., for fork-specific data structures that only use a subset of the base fields and/or when required base fields are known. Verifiers of Merkle proofs for these data structures will not break on new forks.

Motivation

---

Stable containers and profiles are currently not representable in SSZ. Adding support provides these benefits:

1. Stable signatures: Signing roots derived from a StableContainer[N] never change. In the context of Ethereum, this is useful for transaction signatures that are expected to remain valid even when future updates introduce additional transaction fields. Likewise, the overall transaction root remains stable and can be used as a perpetual transaction ID.

2. Stable merkle proofs: Merkle proof verifiers that check specific fields of a StableContainer[N] or Profile[B] do not need continuous updating when future updates introduce additional fields. Common fields always merkleize at the same generalized indices.

3. Optional fields: Current SSZ formats do not support optional fields, prompting designs to use zero values instead. With StableContainer[N] and Profile[B], the SSZ serialization is compact; inactive fields do not consume space.

Specification

---

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 and RFC 8174.

Note: In this document, Optional[T] exclusively refers to Python's typing.Optional. Specifically, Optional[T] is NOT an SSZ type itself!

StableContainer[N]

Similar to the regular SSZ Container, StableContainer[N] defines an ordered heterogeneous collection of fields. N indicates the potential maximum number of fields to which it can ever grow in the future. N MUST be > 0.

All fields of a StableContainer[N] MUST be of of type Optional[T]. Such fields can either represent a present value of SSZ type T, or indicate absence of a value (indicated by None). The default value of an Optional[T] is None.

For the purpose of serialization, StableContainer[N] is always considered "variable-size" regardless of the individual field types.

Stability guarantees

The serialization and merkleization of a StableContainer[N] remains stable as long as:

• The maximum capacity N does not change
• The order of fields does not change
• New fields are always appended to the end
• All fields have immutable SSZ schemas, or recursively adopt StableContainer[N]
• List/Bitlist capacities do not change; shortening is possible via application logic

JSON serialization

JSON serialization follows the canonical JSON mapping of SSZ Container.

Fields of type Optional[T] with a None value SHALL be omitted when serializing to JSON.

Binary serialization

Serialization of StableContainer[N] is defined similarly to the existing logic for Container. Notable changes are:

• A Bitvector[N] is constructed, indicating active fields within the StableContainer[N]. For fields with a present value (not None), a True bit is included. For fields with a None value, a False bit is included. The Bitvector[N] is padded with False bits up through length N
• Only active fields are serialized, i.e., fields with a corresponding True bit in the Bitvector[N]
• The serialization of the Bitvector[N] is prepended to the serialized active fields
• If variable-length fields are serialized, their offsets are relative to the start of serialized active fields, after the Bitvector[N]

Deserialization

Deserialization of a StableContainer[N] starts by deserializing a Bitvector[N]. That value MUST be validated:

• All extra bits in the Bitvector[N] that exceed the number of fields MUST be False

The rest of the data is deserialized same as a regular SSZ Container, consulting the Bitvector[N] to determine which fields are present in the data. Absent fields are skipped during deserialization and assigned None values.

Merkleization

The merkleization specification is extended with the following helper functions:

• chunk_count(type): calculate the amount of leafs for merkleization of the type.
  • StableContainer[N]: always N, regardless of the actual number of fields in the type definition
• mix_in_aux: Given a Merkle root root and an auxiliary SSZ object root aux return hash(root + aux).

To merkleize a StableContainer[N], a Bitvector[N] is constructed, indicating active fields within the StableContainer[N], using the same process as during serialization.

Merkleization hash_tree_root(value) of an object value is extended with:

• mix_in_aux(merkleize(([hash_tree_root(element) if element is not None else Bytes32() for element in value.data] + [Bytes32()] * N)[:N]), hash_tree_root(value.active_fields)) if value is a StableContainer[N].

Profile[B]

Profile[B] also defines an ordered heterogeneous collection of fields, a subset of fields of a base StableContainer type B with the following constraints:

• Fields in Profile[B] correspond to fields with the same field name in B.
• Fields in Profile[B] follow the same order as in B.
• Fields in the base StableContainer type B are all Optional.
  • Fields MAY be disallowed in Profile[B] by omitting them.
  • Fields MAY be kept optional in Profile[B] by retaining them as Optional.
  • Fields MAY be required in Profile[B] by unwrapping them from Optional.
• All field types in Profile[B] MUST be compatible with the corresponding field types in B.
  • Field types are compatible with themselves.
  • byte is compatible with uint8 and vice versa.
  • Bitlist[N] / Bitvector[N] field types are compatible if they share the same capacity N.
  • List[T, N] / Vector[T, N] field types are compatible if T is compatible and if they also share the same capacity N.
  • Container / StableContainer[N] field types are compatible if all inner field types are compatible, if they also share the same field names in the same order, and for StableContainer[N] if they also share the same capacity N.
  • Profile[X] field types are compatible with StableContainer types compatible with X, and are compatible with Profile[Y] where Y is compatible with X if also all inner field types are compatible. Differences solely in optionality do not affect merkleization compatibility.

Serialization

Serialization of Profile[B] is similar to the one of its base StableContainer[N], except that the leading Bitvector is replaced by a sparse representation that only includes information about fields that are optional in Profile[B]. Bits for required fields of Profile[B] as well as the zero-padding to capacity N are not included. If there are no optional fields in Profile[B], the Bitvector is omitted.

Profile[B] is considered "variable-size" iff it contains any Optional[T] or any "variable-size" fields.

Merkleization

Merkleization of Profile[B] follows the merkleization of base type B.

Serialization examples:

• 03420001

  Shape(side=0x42, color=1, radius=None)

• 420001

  Square(side=0x42, color=1)

• 06014200

  Shape(side=None, color=1, radius=0x42)

• 014200

  Circle(radius=0x42, color=1)

While this serialization of Profile[B] is more compact, note that it is not forward-compatible and that context information that determines the underlying data type has to be indicated out of bands. If forward-compatibility is required, Profile[B] SHALL be converted to its base type B and subsequently serialized according to B.

Rationale

---

What are the problems solved by StableContainer[N]?

Current SSZ types are only stable within one version of a specification, i.e., one fork of Ethereum. This is alright for messages pertaining to a specific fork, such as attestations or beacon blocks. However, it is a limitation for messages that are expected to remain valid across forks, such as transactions or receipts. In order to support evolving the features of such perpetually valid message types, a new SSZ scheme needs to be defined. Furthermore, consumers of Merkle proofs may have a different software update cadence as Ethereum; an implementation should not break just because a new fork introduces unrelated new features.

To avoid restricting design space, the scheme has to support extension with new fields, obsolescence of old fields, and new combinations of existing fields. When such adjustments occur, old messages must still deserialize correctly and must retain their original Merkle root.

What are the problems solved by Profile[B]?

The forward-compatible merkleization of StableContainer may be desirable even in situations where only a single sub-type is valid at any given time, e.g., as determined by the fork schedule. In such situations, message size can be reduced and type safety increased by exchanging Profile[B] instead of the underlying base type. This can be useful, e.g., for consensus data structures such as BeaconState, to ensure that Merkle proofs for its fields remain compatible across forks.

Why not Union[T, U, V]?

There is combinatorial complexity when new optional features are introduced. For example, if there are three transaction types, and then priority fees are introduced as an optional feature, one has to define three additional transaction types to allow inclusion of a priority fee, raising the total to six transaction types. If, subsequently, optional access lists are introduced, that doubles again, to twelve transaction types.

Union also requires each participant of the network to know about all existing Union cases. For example, if the execution layer provides transactions via engine API as a Union, the consensus layer would also have to know about all concrete Union cases, even though it only wishes to package them and forward them. Using StableContainer[N] provides a more similar situation as JSON where the underlying type is determined based on the presence / absence of fields and their values.

Typically, the individual Union cases share some form of thematic overlap, sharing certain fields with each other. In a Union, shared fields are not necessarily merkleized at the same generalized indices. Therefore, Merkle proof systems would have to be updated each time that a new flavor is introduced, even when the actual changes are not of interest to the particular system.

Furthermore, SSZ Union types are currently not used in any final Ethereum specification and do not have a finalized design themselves. The StableContainer[N] serializes very similar to current Union[T, U, V] proposals, with the difference being a Bitvector[N] as a prefix instead of a selector byte. This means that the serialized byte lengths are comparable.

Why not model Optional[T] as an SSZ type?

If Optional[T] is modeled as an SSZ type, each individual field introduces serialization and merkleization overhead. As an Optional[T] would be required to be "variable-size", lots of additional offset bytes would have to be used in the serialization. For merkleization, each individual Optional[T] would require mixing in a bit to indicate presence or absence of the value.

Additionally, every time that the number of fields reaches a new power of 2, the Merkle roots break, as the number of chunks doubles. The StableContainer[N] solves this by artificially extending the Merkle tree to N chunks regardless of the actual number of fields currently specified. Because N is constant across specification versions, the Merkle tree shape remains stable. The overhead of the additional empty placeholder leaves only affects serialization of the Bitvector[N] (1 byte per 8 leaves); the number of required hashes during merkleization only grows logarithmically with N.

Backwards Compatibility

---

StableContainer[N] and Profile[B] are new SSZ types and do not conflict with other SSZ types currently in use.

Test Cases

---

See EIP assets.

Reference Implementation

---

See EIP assets, based on protolambda/remerkleable.

Security Considerations

---

None

Copyright

---

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.